Development of an international core domain set for medium, large and giant congenital melanocytic naevi as a first step towards a core outcome set for clinical practice and research.

BACKGROUND: Medium, large and giant congenital melanocytic naevi (CMN) can impose a psychosocial burden on patients and families, and are associated with increased risk of developing melanoma or neurological symptoms. Lack of consensus on what outcomes to measure makes it difficult to advise patients and families about treatment and to set up best practice for CMN. OBJECTIVES: Fostering consensus among patient representatives and professionals, we aim to develop a core outcome set, defined as the minimum set of outcomes to measure and report in care and all clinical trials of a specific health condition. We focused on the 'what to measure' aspect, the so-called core domain set (CDS), following the COMET and CS-COUSIN guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to identify outcomes reported in the literature. Focus groups with patient representatives identified patient-reported outcomes. All these outcomes were classified into domains. Through e-Delphi surveys, 144 stakeholders from 27 countries iteratively rated the importance of domains and outcomes. An online consensus meeting attended by seven patient representatives and seven professionals finalized the CDS. RESULTS: We reached consensus on six domains, four of which were applied to both care and research: 'quality of life', 'neoplasms', 'nervous system' and 'anatomy of skin'. 'Adverse events' was specific to care and 'pathology' to research. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a CDS for medium-to-giant CMN. Its application in reporting care and research of CMN will facilitate treatment comparisons. The next step will be to reach consensus on the specific outcomes for each of the domains and what instruments should be used to measure these domains and outcomes.

Outcomes and measurement instruments used in congenital melanocytic naevi research: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Congenital melanocytic naevi (CMN) can have a great impact on patients' lives due to the remarkable appearance and the risk of developing melanoma and neurocutaneous melanosis. Comparison of treatment efficacy is currently hindered by the lack of standard and uniform outcome reporting; this impedes guidance on optimal management policy. To address this, we aim to perform the first step in developing a core outcome set. With this systematic review, we identified a list of domains, outcomes (including patient reported outcomes) and outcome measurement instruments used in CMN research. METHODS: The review was registered in PROSPERO, registration number CRD42018095235. A search was conducted in EMBASE (Ovid), PubMed and the Cochrane Library from 2006 to January 2019. Studies with 10 or more patients, with all sizes of CMN and reporting outcomes on interventional and conservative management were included. RESULTS: A total of 1,285 individual studies was found; 63 studies were included. We extracted 57 different outcomes and 34 outcome measurement instruments showing large heterogeneity. Patient-reported outcomes were included in 38% of studies. Few outcome measurement instruments were described. Moreover, none of the studies reported that the used instruments were ever validated in a CMN population. CONCLUSION: Heterogeneity exists in outcomes and instruments used in CMN research. The development of a core outcome set may reduce this heterogeneity in future research, thereby enabling treatment comparison and eventually facilitating guidance on management. Furthermore, this overview demonstrates a need for the use and validation of (patient reported) outcome measurement instruments for CMN.

Protocol for the development of core set of domains of the core outcome set for patients with congenital melanocytic naevi (OCOMEN project).

BACKGROUND: Having large congenital melanocytic naevi (CMN) is associated with a psychosocial burden on patients and their parents because of its remarkable appearance and the extra care it may require. Large CMN also pose an increased risk of malignant melanoma or neurocutaneous melanosis. There is a lack of international consensus on what important outcome domains to measure in relation to treatment. This makes it difficult to compare options, to properly inform patients and their parents, and to set up treatment policy for CMN. Therefore, we aim to develop a core outcome set (COS), i.e. the minimum set of outcomes that are recommended to be measured and reported in all clinical trials of a specific health condition. This COS can be used in the follow-up of CMN patients with or without treatment, in clinical research and practice. METHODS: In the Outcomes for Congenital Melanocytic Nevi (OCOMEN) projects, we follow the recommendations from the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative and the Cochrane Skin Core Outcomes Set Initiative (CS-COUSIN). This project entails the following: (i) a systematic review to identify the previous reported outcomes in literature; (ii) focus groups with national and international patients and parents to identify patient-important outcomes; (iii) classification of outcomes into outcome domains; (iv) e-Delphi surveys in which stakeholders (patients/parents and professionals) can rate the importance of domains and outcomes; and (v) an online consensus meeting to finalize the core outcome domains of the COS. RESULTS: The results will be disseminated by means of publication in a leading journal and presentations in international meetings or conferences. We engage international experts in CMN, both patients and professionals, to ensure the international utility and applicability of the COS.

Laser treatment of congenital melanocytic naevi: a systematic review.

Recent studies on congenital melanocytic naevi (CMN) indicate a lower risk of melanoma than has been previously assumed. As a result, the treatment paradigm in CMN has shifted from complete removal to cosmetically acceptable, less invasive treatment options, such as laser treatment. Our objective was to review systematically the efficacy and safety of laser therapy for CMN. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PubMed. We rated the quality of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Twenty-four eligible studies (three nonrandomized controlled studies; 21 case series) with 434 patients were included; the majority were of poor quality). Twenty different laser modalities or combinations were evaluated. Overall, the Q-switched laser was used most frequently, although large or giant CMN were generally treated with an ablative laser. Owing to heterogeneity between studies, comparison between laser modalities was hampered and statistical analysis was precluded. Lasers in CMN showed rather good results (albeit with very low-quality evidence) for clearing of hyperpigmentation in the short term. Outcome measures varied widely, patient satisfaction was rarely measured and high incidences of scarring, repigmentation and complications were reported. No malignant change was seen. While most studies report short-term improvement of CMN after laser therapy, there is no high-quality evidence for the efficacy and safety of laser modalities in CMN in the long term. Future research should focus on well-conducted and well-reported prospective studies on different laser modalities for CMN, with the use of recognized and validated outcome measures.

Incidence and relative survival of melanoma in children and adolescents in the Netherlands, 1989-2013.

BACKGROUND: Melanoma is rare in the first two decades of life. Trends in incidence differ across countries. OBJECTIVE: To describe incidence and relative survival of children and adolescents with melanoma in the Netherlands for children (0 through 11 years) and adolescents (12 through 19 years) separately. We hypothesized that adolescent melanoma increased in contrast to childhood melanoma, possibly due to a difference in cancer biology and sun exposure patterns. METHODS: Data on all patients of 0-19 years diagnosed between 1989 and 2013 with histologically confirmed cutaneous invasive melanoma were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Incidence trends were analysed with Joinpoint regression. Relative survival analysis was performed. RESULTS: Between 1989 and 2013, 80 children and 544 adolescents with melanoma were registered in the NCR. Median age at diagnosis was 17 years (IQR 15-18); the female-to-male ratio was 1.7 : 1 Statistically significant incidence trends were found in the older age group (12-19 years): an increasing incidence since 1991 [annual percentage change (APC) 3.2%, 95%CI 1.3-5.1] followed by a decrease from 2005 to 2013 (APC -4.9%, 95%CI -9.6-0.0). No incidence trends for childhood melanoma were observed (APC 0.3%, 95% CI -3.0-3.8). Relative survival at 1, 5 and 10 years was 98% (95% CI 97-99), 94% (95% CI 92-96) and 90% (95% CI 87-92), respectively. Survival was worse in males and higher Breslow thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Melanoma is very rare under the age of 12 with stable incidence rates. In comparison with childhood melanoma, melanomas in adolescents are more common with a decreasing trend in the past decade. Male sex and increasing Breslow thickness are associated with worse survival in paediatric melanoma patients.